Category: Past News

This past April the Consortium of Social Science Associations (COSSA) hosted their annual Social Science Advocacy Day. On Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., social scientists from across the country converged to talk with lawmakers about the importance of social and behavioral science.

Advocates were teamed with other social scientists from their state to participate in a day of meetings with members of Congress and representatives from their offices. They discussed the importance of federal support for social and behavioral science.. COSSA provided training and logistical support (including scheduling meetings with Congressional offices and providing an on-call expert to answer day-of policy questions), as well as materials to help advocates communicate their message to policymakers.

The Owens Institute for Behavioral Research (OIBR) sponsored two OIBR distinguished scholars, Dr. Lydia Aletraris, Associate Research Scientist, School of Social Work, and Dr. Scott Ardoin, Associate Dean for Research and Graduate Education and Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, for the event.

Dr. Aletraris, whose research spans topics from cannabis policy to human trafficking, began her first journey into legislative advocacy. Reflecting on her expectations versus reality, she noted the whirlwind pace of the meetings, where time was precious. “The fast pace of the meetings served as a valuable lesson in having clear, succinct, and impactful talking points ready,” she remarked. She quickly learned the art of filtering complex research into digestible narratives that resonate with policymakers.

For Dr. Ardoin, whose expertise lies in reading comprehension and classroom behavior management, the experience was equally enlightening. He highlighted the importance of aligning advocacy efforts with the interests of policymakers. “Just because they will be voting on an item does not mean that the item is important to them,” he emphasized. Understanding the agenda of congressional leaders and framing advocacy within that context emerged as a key takeaway.

Both scholars echoed the need for greater education and collective recognition within the social science community. Dr. Ardoin emphasized the importance of disseminating research beyond academic circles, advocating for a unified approach under the umbrella term of social science. “If we only talk about our specific areas, we risk overlooking the shared importance of our research,” he emphasized. Dr. Aletraris echoed this sentiment, stressing the significance of collaboration and broader dissemination efforts to foster public appreciation for scientific endeavors.

May 14, 2023 Written by: Andrea Horsman

Agricultural biotechnology straddles the line between prosperity and peril, offering both the potential to transform economies and the risk of severe environmental and health consequences. This dichotomy forms the heart of the research project “Prosperity, Plants, and Pesticides: The Dangers and Opportunities of Agricultural Biotechnology,” led by Dr. Pablo Lapegna, an Associate Professor of Sociology and Latin American and Caribbean Studies at the University of Georgia (UGA). With recent grant support from the National Endowment for the Humanities, Lapegna hopes to unravel these complexities through a forthcoming book and a comprehensive online repository, alongside his collaborator Johana Kunin (a professor of anthropology at the Universidad Nacional de San Martin, UNSAM, and a researcher at CONICET, the National Scientific and Technical Research Council, both in Argentina).

The Seeds of Research
Lapegna’s research in agricultural biotechnology and its dual-edged impacts began with his earlier work, encapsulated in his book “Soybeans and Power.” This study delved into the repercussions of pesticide use on marginalized populations, particularly small farmers in northern Argentina. Witnessing firsthand the stark contrast between communities suffering from pesticide drift and those flourishing from the economic gains of genetically modified soybean production sparked the idea for his current research.

“Farming needs to use herbicides because that’s the way that you guarantee good yields,” Lapegna explains. “The bigger the yield, the more profit you get as a farmer.” This fundamental tension—between economic prosperity and the health and environmental impacts of pesticide use—is central to Lapegna’s latest investigation.

The Human Element
One aspect of this research is its focus on mid-sized family farmers in Argentina who inhabit the very lands they cultivate. These farmers, often descendants of Spanish and Italian migrants, are relatively prosperous and live comfortably compared to other middle-class Argentinians. Yet, they share the same air and water, and so, the same health risks posed by pesticide use.

Lapegna shares an intriguing ambivalence among these farmers about the health impacts of pesticides. “There’s a claim that pesticides create cancer clusters in many farming towns,” he notes. While this notion gains traction primarily in urban areas and among environmental activists, farmers themselves are skeptical yet not entirely dismissive. This ambivalence is central to Lapegna’s research on how farmers experience the tensions between their economic success and the potential health hazards of pesticide exposure.

Voices from the Fields
Throughout his research, Lapegna has been struck by the farmers’ willingness to share their stories. Contrary to their often-negative portrayal in the media, these farmers provide a nuanced perspective on their practices. They emphasize the knowledge and care involved in farming, the generational legacy tied to their land, and their belief in the safe use of pesticides when managed properly.

One poignant anecdote underscores the pride and heritage these farmers feel. Lapegna recounts meeting an extraordinarily successful farmer who, despite his wealth, cherishes the old steering wheel of his grandfather’s tractor that is hanging on the wall of his office, a symbol of the hard work and perseverance that built their family’s prosperity. This farmer’s story epitomizes the broader narrative Lapegna looks to capture: the delicate balance between pride, tradition, and the harsh realities of modern agriculture.

Looking Ahead
As Lapegna and an interdisciplinary team—including experts from UGA and beyond—delve deeper into their research, they plan to employ innovative methods such as using silicone wristbands to measure pesticide exposure among farmers. This approach aims to gather concrete data on the everyday realities of pesticide exposure in farming communities.

Lapegna’s research looks to highlight how modern life, dependent on various toxic substances, navigates the delicate balance between benefit and harm. By integrating humanistic social sciences with environmental humanities, his project aims to offer a comprehensive understanding of our relationship with nature and its inherent tensions. In a world increasingly reliant on agricultural biotechnology, the insights from “Prosperity, Plants, and Pesticides” could be globally invaluable. As Lapegna aptly puts it, “There are all kinds of products that we cannot live without, but at the same time, they may be killing us.” This research holds the promise of guiding us toward a more balanced and informed approach to the challenges and opportunities in agricultural biotechnology.

Written by: Andrea Horsman